Back to the directory

Drug discovery · Mechanobiology

Forcyte Biotechnologies

A UCLA spinout that turned how hard a single cell squeezes into a number, then ran that number as a drug screen. The federal record is detailed through 2022. After August 2023 the company stops speaking.

Founded2017 · Los Angeles, CA
FoundersIvan Pushkarsky, Dino Di Carlo, Robert Damoiseaux
PlatformFLECS contractility assay, 384-well format
Federal grants$3,185,607 from NIH, FY2018 to FY2022
AcceleratorY Combinator, Winter 2021
StatusNo company news after Aug 2023; data providers list it as closed

A plate full of very small springs

Start with a standard 384-well plate. Inside each well sit more than 1,200 fluorescent micropatterns, each one a dot of adhesive protein printed onto a soft silicone film. A single human cell lands on a dot, grips it, and pulls. The dot shrinks. How much it shrinks is how hard that cell squeezed.

A microscope photographs an entire well in one frame. Software measures every dot. What comes out is not a stain standing in for force. It is the force, cell by cell, thousands at a time.

An application note written with Molecular Devices shows what that buys you. Twelve lines of primary human airway smooth muscle cells, six from fatally asthmatic donors and six without asthma, fit on one plate, and the instrument tracked more than 100,000 contracting single cells at four minute intervals. Mechanobiology, until then a boutique discipline done a few cells at a time, at the scale of a screening campaign.

The gap it was aimed at

A surprising number of common diseases are, at bottom, cells pulling too hard or not hard enough. Asthma is airway smooth muscle squeezing the airway shut. Fibrosis is myofibroblasts stiffening tissue until an organ stops working. Underactive bladder is detrusor muscle that will not contract enough to empty. Preterm labor is uterine muscle contracting months too early.

Industrial drug screening measured almost none of that directly. It measured surrogates: calcium flux, gene expression, a stain on a cell that had already been killed and fixed. The founding team's 2018 paper in Nature Biomedical Engineering attacked the most popular surrogate with its own data, reporting that “the calcium level is ultimately a poor quantitative predictor of cellular force generation.” The same paper carried the observation the whole company was built on: asthmatic airway cells squeeze harder and faster than healthy ones. If the disease shows up in the squeeze, screen the squeeze.

Three founders and one lab bench

Ivan Pushkarsky co-invented the technology during his bioengineering PhD at UCLA and, in the company's own words, “launched Forcyte with his advisors after graduation.” His advisor Dino Di Carlo holds an endowed chair in Engineering and Medicine at UCLA and has co-founded seven companies. Robert Damoiseaux is a UCLA professor of molecular and medical pharmacology who runs the university's Molecular Screening Shared Resource, which is to say he owns the robots.

The Los Angeles Business Journal reported in January 2019 that the firm “was founded in 2017 by UCLA bioengineering professors Ivan Pushkarsky and Dino Di Carlo, as well as Robert Damoiseaux, a UCLA professor of molecular and medical pharmacology.” One title is wrong; Pushkarsky was the graduate student. The point stands. This was an academic lab walking its instrument out the door, and the patent stayed with the University of California and was licensed back.

Grant money first, venture money later

Forcyte ran on federal small business grants for years before it ran on equity. Eleven NIH awards between fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2022 total $3,185,607 across five institutes and five disease programs: asthma and hypertension at NCATS, migraine at NCCIH, preterm birth at NICHD, cardiac contractility at NIGMS, and underactive bladder at NIDDK. The asthma and hypertension line alone accounts for $1,928,518.

The equity side arrived thinly and awkwardly. A Form D filed on January 10, 2019 reported a $2,000,000 offering with $1,000,000 already sold to three investors. Five days later the company amended it. “An attorney representing Forcyte Biotechnologies updated the securities filing on Jan. 15, after realizing the earlier filing was made in error, said company founder Ivan Pushkarsky.” The corrected figure was $160,000.

Y Combinator took the company into its Winter 2021 batch. In June 2022 Forcyte announced new money from Milestone View, Pioneer Fund, Acequia Capital, Y Combinator and Jude Gomila, without naming an amount, saying only that “Including public support, this funding brings Forcyte’s total raised to $5.7M”. No Form D was ever filed for that round.

The last essay

On August 1, 2023 the company published a long manifesto on its blog, and it reads like a company that believed it had won the argument. It claimed the platform had built “the world’s largest specifically designed and highly curated mechanobiology data repository” and that “we’ve screened >300,000 small molecule compounds across multiple unique primary human cell types”.

It is the last dated post on the site. A preprint appeared in January 2025 with seven Forcyte-affiliated authors, reporting “the first high-throughput contractility screen of an annotated kinase inhibitor library, evaluating 2,418 compounds across five primary human cell types”. No journal version has appeared since.

What is proven, and what is still claimed

Operations track. Forcyte never filed with the FDA and never registered a trial. It was a discovery platform, so the evidence to weigh is grants, patents, papers and named customers.
EvidenceWhat the record showsSource type
Federal grantsEleven NIH SBIR and STTR awards, $3,185,607, FY2018 through FY2022, across NCATS, NCCIH, NICHD, NIGMS and NIDDK. Last award FY2022; last project end date Aug 31, 2023.Public record
SEC filingsTwo, both January 2019. Form D on Jan 10: $2,000,000 offered, $1,000,000 sold, three investors. Form D/A on Jan 15: sold restated to $160,000. Nothing filed since.Public record
PatentUS 11,592,438, issued Feb 28, 2023, assigned to The Regents of the University of California, in a family reaching back to a 2014 provisional. Licensed to Forcyte, not owned by it.Public record
Peer-reviewed workFive papers from 2018 to 2024 plus a 2025 preprint. The 2024 fibrosis paper reports a 40,000 compound screen yielding 42 hits, 19 of them selective for myofibroblasts.Public record
Clinical and regulatoryNo registered trials, no FDA 510(k) and no PMA records found on Sep 23, 2026. Four pipeline programs were published in lung fibrosis, asthma and overactive bladder, every target listed as “Novel Undisclosed”.Not found
Pharma partnershipThe June 2022 release cites “an ongoing partnership with an undisclosed leading pharmaceutical company”. No partner was ever named and no terms were disclosed.Company-stated
Scale of the dataClaimed data on “>2.4 million cell-drug-timepoint combinations from >360 million individual primary human cells” by June 2022. Never released or audited.Company-stated
Total capital$5.7M including public support (June 2022), of which NIH is $3,185,607. Documented equity at the SEC is $160,000. CB Insights lists $130K raised; Tracxn lists $5.7M across eight rounds.Sources disagree
Operating statusLast dated company post Aug 1, 2023. Last archived home page returning 200: Jan 14, 2026. On Sep 23, 2026 the domain answered with a certificate for *.sucuri.net, not for forcytebio.com. Seedtable marks the status closed and says the founder reports the wind-down. A contact database dates his chief executive role 2017 to 2026 and places him at BioRender from 2026.Independent

Read plainly: the science is real and on the public record. A validated high-throughput contractility assay exists, it found hits in fibrosis, and five NIH institutes paid for the work. The second half never arrived. No named pharma partner, no named target, no priced venture round on file, no clinical program. Federal grants outweigh documented equity by about twenty to one, which is a fine way to build an instrument and a hard way to fund a drug pipeline.

What to watch

  • Whether the January 2025 kinase inhibitor preprint reaches a journal. It is the newest scientific output attached to the company.
  • Where the UCLA patent family lands. The Regents own it; a lapsed license is the cleanest signal the company is finished.
  • Whether the assay survives the company. FLECS plates were sold as research consumables, so the technology has users beyond the founders.
  • Any public account from Ivan Pushkarsky, who spent five years arguing that drug discovery ignores physics. It would be worth more than an aggregator status field.

In their words

“Contractile cell function is critically important all throughout the body, in virtually every cell type, and its dysfunction drives many diseases”

Ivan Pushkarsky, co-founder and CEO, June 2022 funding release · Company release

“Our FLECS Platform re-invents how we approach mechanobiology, enabling us to look at, not only a few cells or only one target hypothesis, but at literally millions of single cells, from any tissue”

Ivan Pushkarsky, June 2022 funding release · Company release

“In the complex symphony of life, where genetic, biochemical and electrical systems often take center stage, a pivotal performer remains in the shadows: our cells’ mechanical systems.”

Forcyte Bio company essay, August 1, 2023 · Company blog

“airway smooth muscle cells isolated from fatally asthmatic patients have innately greater and faster force-generation capacity in response to stimulation than healthy control cells”

Pushkarsky et al., Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2018 · Peer reviewed

“With the fully automated assay we screened a library of 40,000 novel small molecules in under 80 h of total assay run-time.”

Wang et al., SLAS Discovery, April 2024 · Peer reviewed

“Its founder reports that operations were wound down.”

Seedtable company profile, accessed September 23, 2026 · Data provider
Forcyte Biotechnologies funding profile on HVCFHealthcare Venture Capital Fund

Related companies

Sources

  1. Public recordForm D and Form D/A, Forcyte Biotechnologies, Inc., CIK 0001760069SEC EDGAR · Jan 10 and Jan 15, 2019
  2. Public recordNIH RePORTER, 11 awards: TR002350, AT009962, HD097002, GM146269, DK129187NIH · FY2018 to FY2022
  3. Public recordUS Patent 11,592,438, force phenotyping of cellsUSPTO · issued Feb 28, 2023
  4. Public recordPapers in Nature Biomedical Engineering, Assay and Drug Development Technologies, Journal of Visualized Experiments and SLAS Discovery, plus a 2025 preprintPubMed and bioRxiv
  5. IndependentUPDATE: Brentwood-Based Forcyte Biotechnologies Targets $2M RaiseLos Angeles Business Journal · Jan 14, 2019
  6. IndependentMechano-therapeutics Discovery Startup Forcyte Bio Secures New FundingBioSpace · Jun 1, 2022
  7. IndependentForcyte Biotechnologies Secures Funding; Totals $5.7MFinSMEs · Jun 2, 2022
  8. IndependentForcyte Biotechnologies company profile, status closedSeedtable · accessed Sep 23, 2026
  9. IndependentForcyte Biotechnologies profile, Y Combinator W21 collectionCB Insights · accessed Sep 23, 2026
  10. CompanyThe body is (also) a mechanical systemForcyte Bio blog · Aug 1, 2023
  11. CompanyForcyte Bio Secures New Funding From Y Combinator and OthersBusiness Wire · Jun 1, 2022
  12. PartnerHigh-throughput screening of single-cell contractile force using FLECS TechnologyMolecular Devices application note

Profile researched and written by Healthcare Discovery. Last updated September 29, 2026.