Natural Cycles: The Only FDA-Cleared Digital Contraceptive App

In 2018, the FDA did something it had never done before: it cleared a smartphone app as a method of contraception. The decision was controversial, the science behind it was real, and the regulatory precedent it set may reshape how we think about digital health tools for reproductive autonomy.

Presented By Our Partners

For more than half a century, the landscape of contraception has been dominated by hormonal methods (the pill, IUDs, implants) and barrier methods (condoms, diaphragms). Fertility awareness-based methods (FABMs), which rely on identifying fertile and infertile days through physiological signals, have existed for decades but have been regarded by most clinicians as less reliable, largely because they depend on user skill, daily discipline, and subjective observations. Natural Cycles changed this conversation by applying a statistical algorithm to daily basal body temperature (BBT) measurements, producing a binary daily output: green day (not fertile, unprotected intercourse is low risk) or red day (potentially fertile, use protection or abstain). The FDA granted Natural Cycles De Novo classification in August 2018, making it the first and, as of 2026, the only digitally delivered contraceptive cleared by the FDA. Clinical data supporting the clearance showed a 93% typical-use effectiveness rate and a 98% perfect-use effectiveness rate, placing Natural Cycles in the same general effectiveness range as condoms (87% typical use) and above fertility awareness methods that lack algorithmic support.

What Is Natural Cycles?

Natural Cycles is a subscription-based smartphone app paired with a basal body thermometer that together function as a digital contraceptive. Each morning, the user measures her oral BBT before getting out of bed and enters the reading into the app. The algorithm analyzes the temperature data, combined with optional LH test results and menstrual cycle dates, to determine whether the current day is fertile (red) or infertile (green). On green days, the app indicates that unprotected intercourse carries low conception risk. On red days, the app recommends using protection or abstaining.

The algorithm uses statistical modeling calibrated to the individual user’s cycle data, improving its predictions as it accumulates more temperature readings over successive cycles. New users typically see more red days in early cycles as the algorithm learns their pattern, with the proportion of green days increasing over time as the model gains confidence.

Natural Cycles costs $99.99 per year (or $12.99 per month), which includes the subscription and a Bluetooth-connected oral basal thermometer. No additional hardware is required. The app is available for iOS and Android. Natural Cycles holds FDA De Novo clearance as a Class II medical device for contraceptive use, and the company is required to conduct post-market surveillance studies as a condition of clearance.

The Science Behind Algorithm-Based Fertility Awareness

Natural Cycles’ algorithm is built on the physiological foundation of the biphasic temperature pattern across the menstrual cycle. After ovulation, progesterone production by the corpus luteum raises the hypothalamic temperature set point by approximately 0.2 to 0.5 degrees Celsius. This postovulatory temperature rise, when sustained for three consecutive days, confirms that ovulation has occurred and the fertile window has closed. The infertile luteal phase then continues until menstruation.

The algorithmic contribution is in the pre-ovulatory phase, where the challenge is predicting when ovulation will occur rather than confirming that it has passed. Natural Cycles uses historical cycle data, statistical modeling of follicular phase length variability, and optional LH test integration to estimate the opening of the fertile window with increasing precision over successive cycles. The algorithm conservatively assigns red (fertile) days when uncertainty is high, which is why new users see more red days initially.

The clinical evidence supporting Natural Cycles’ FDA clearance includes a prospective study of over 15,000 women in Sweden, with a reported Pearl Index of 6.5 for typical use (approximately 93% effectiveness) and 1.0 for perfect use (approximately 99% effectiveness). The typical-use Pearl Index of 6.5 means that approximately 6.5 out of 100 women using Natural Cycles for one year experienced an unintended pregnancy, including pregnancies that occurred on red days when protection was used incorrectly or not at all.

For context, the typical-use effectiveness of male condoms is approximately 87% (Pearl Index ~13), hormonal IUDs exceed 99%, and combined oral contraceptives achieve approximately 93% with typical use. Natural Cycles’ 93% typical-use rate places it roughly comparable to the pill in real-world effectiveness, though significantly below long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs).

A 2024 review in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology by Cromack and Walter noted that Natural Cycles holds a unique regulatory position as the only FDA-cleared digital contraceptive. The review highlighted the growing market of fertility tracking technologies but emphasized that most have not undergone the clinical validation required for contraceptive claims.

That is the science. Here is how Natural Cycles applies it.

What Natural Cycles Does Well

Natural Cycles’ most significant achievement is its FDA De Novo clearance as a contraceptive. This is not a marketing claim or a general wellness designation. It is a regulatory determination that the product meets the FDA’s standards for safety and effectiveness as a method of birth control. No other app or digital tool has achieved this clearance, giving Natural Cycles a unique and defensible position in the market.

The non-hormonal approach addresses a genuine unmet need. A significant and growing population of women prefer non-hormonal contraception due to side effects experienced with hormonal methods, personal values, medical contraindications, or a desire to maintain their natural hormonal cycle. Natural Cycles provides a clinically validated non-hormonal option that goes beyond traditional FABMs by adding algorithmic precision to what was previously a more subjective practice.

The algorithm’s individualized learning improves over time. As Natural Cycles accumulates more temperature data from a specific user, its predictions become more precise, and the proportion of green (infertile) days increases. This personalization distinguishes it from generic calendar-based rhythm methods, which use population averages rather than individual data.

The integration of optional LH test strip results (users can enter positive/negative LH results from any brand of test strips) adds a second data stream that improves ovulation timing precision, particularly in the critical pre-ovulatory window where temperature data alone is least predictive.

Featured Partner

Invest in the Infrastructure Behind Modern Medicine

As healthcare expands beyond hospital walls, the buildings and campuses supporting that shift are generating compelling returns for investors who move early. The Healthcare Real Estate Fund offers qualified investors direct access to a curated portfolio of medical office, outpatient, and specialty care facilities.

Learn More →

Pricing, Access, and Practical Realities

Natural Cycles costs $99.99 per year (annual plan) or $12.99 per month (monthly plan). Both plans include a Bluetooth-connected oral basal thermometer. Total first-year cost is $99.99 to $155.88 depending on the plan selected. Subsequent years cost the same for the subscription; the thermometer lasts multiple years.

Natural Cycles holds FDA De Novo clearance as a Class II medical device for contraception. This is the highest regulatory endorsement any digital fertility tool has achieved. The app is not classified as a general wellness product; it is a cleared medical device with specific contraceptive claims.

HSA and FSA eligibility for Natural Cycles varies. Some plans cover FDA-cleared contraceptive devices; users should verify with their specific benefits administrator. Under the Affordable Care Act, insurance coverage for FDA-cleared contraceptives may apply, though coverage for digital contraceptives specifically depends on the insurer.

The daily BBT measurement requirement is the primary practical barrier. Users must measure their temperature at roughly the same time each morning, before getting out of bed or engaging in activity. Inconsistent measurement times, alcohol consumption the night before, illness, and disrupted sleep can all affect BBT readings and may result in the algorithm assigning additional red days due to unreliable data. This behavioral requirement is more demanding than passive wearable alternatives but less burdensome than multi-symptom FABMs that also require cervical mucus observation.

Who Natural Cycles Is Best For

Natural Cycles is best suited for women who are committed to daily BBT measurement and want an FDA-cleared non-hormonal contraceptive option. Women who have experienced intolerable side effects from hormonal contraception, who have medical contraindications to hormonal methods, or who prefer to maintain their natural cycle for personal or philosophical reasons are the primary audience.

The product works best for women with relatively regular menstrual cycles (21 to 35 days) who have consistent sleep schedules and can reliably measure temperature each morning. Women in stable relationships where both partners are comfortable using protection on red days are ideal candidates.

Women who need the highest possible contraceptive effectiveness should consider LARCs (hormonal IUDs, copper IUDs, implants), which exceed 99% effectiveness. Women with highly irregular cycles, frequent travel across time zones, inconsistent sleep patterns, or conditions that affect basal body temperature (thyroid disorders, shift work) may find the algorithm less reliable. Natural Cycles is not recommended as a sole contraceptive method for women for whom an unintended pregnancy would carry serious medical risk.

How Natural Cycles Compares

The Ava Fertility Bracelet ($299, no subscription) tracks five physiological parameters during sleep for fertile window detection with 90% published accuracy. Ava is FDA cleared for fertility tracking to aid conception, not for contraception. Ava’s passive overnight monitoring eliminates the daily BBT measurement burden but does not carry contraceptive-grade regulatory clearance. For women seeking to prevent pregnancy, Natural Cycles’ specific contraceptive clearance is a critical regulatory advantage.

Tempdrop 2.0 ($149 to $199, no subscription) provides continuous overnight BBT via an armband sensor and exports data to various FAM charting apps. Tempdrop has no FDA contraceptive clearance. Users who employ Tempdrop for natural family planning do so outside any regulatory framework for contraception. The hardware is a one-time cost versus Natural Cycles’ annual subscription.

The Clearblue Advanced Digital OPK ($39.99 to $49.99/kit) identifies the fertile window through direct urinary hormone measurement. Clearblue is designed for conception optimization, not contraception. Its hormone-based approach directly measures the biochemical signals that Natural Cycles infers from temperature data.

Traditional fertility awareness methods (sympto-thermal, Billings, Marquette) rely on multiple biomarkers (temperature, cervical mucus, cervical position, LH testing) interpreted by a trained practitioner. These methods can achieve high effectiveness with perfect use (97 to 99.6% depending on the method and study) but require more extensive training and self-observation than Natural Cycles’ single-metric, algorithm-driven approach.

Limitations and Open Questions

The 93% typical-use effectiveness rate means approximately 7 out of 100 women using Natural Cycles for one year will experience an unintended pregnancy. This rate is comparable to the pill but substantially lower than LARCs (over 99%). Women for whom an unintended pregnancy would have serious consequences should weigh this effectiveness gap carefully.

The daily measurement requirement creates an adherence burden that passive wearables eliminate. Missed or unreliable temperature readings result in additional red days, which can reduce the proportion of green days and may frustrate users seeking maximum spontaneity. Alcohol, illness, disrupted sleep, and inconsistent measurement timing all degrade data quality.

Natural Cycles’ effectiveness data comes primarily from a single large prospective study conducted by the company in Sweden. The study population was predominantly young, well-educated, and in stable relationships. Effectiveness in more diverse populations, different cultural contexts, and among users with less consistent measurement habits has not been as thoroughly characterized.

The algorithm’s conservative approach to uncertainty means new users experience a higher proportion of red days during the first one to three cycles as the system learns their pattern. This “break-in period” may require more frequent use of barrier methods than users initially expect.

What This Means for Your Health

Contraceptive choice is a deeply personal health decision that intersects with nearly every dimension of wellbeing. The ability to plan if and when to have children influences career trajectory, financial stability, mental health, relationship dynamics, and long-term life planning. Within Healthcare Discovery‘s Five Pillars, reproductive autonomy connects to mindset (agency over life decisions), nutrition (pregnancy demands specific nutritional preparation), and sleep (the hormonal effects of both pregnancy and hormonal contraception directly affect sleep architecture).

Natural Cycles represents a category expansion in contraceptive options: the first time a digital algorithm has been validated and cleared by the FDA as a method of birth control. For women who cannot or choose not to use hormonal methods, this provides a clinically backed alternative that goes beyond the unassisted calendar and temperature methods of previous generations.

The broader healthspan context is that reproductive health decisions ripple across decades. Unintended pregnancies carry health, economic, and psychological costs that extend well beyond the pregnancy itself. Conversely, hormonal contraception, while highly effective, introduces exogenous hormones that some women experience as detrimental to their subjective wellbeing and physiological balance. Natural Cycles offers a middle path: algorithmic precision applied to the body’s own signals, without exogenous hormones, within a regulatory framework that holds the product to clinical standards of evidence.

No contraceptive method is perfect, and Natural Cycles’ 93% typical-use rate reflects real-world human behavior, including inconsistent use on red days. But the existence of an FDA-cleared digital contraceptive, validated through a study of 15,000+ women, represents a meaningful advance in reproductive technology. For the right user, someone disciplined, informed, and comfortable with the effectiveness profile, Natural Cycles delivers something that was not available a decade ago: a regulated, non-hormonal, evidence-based digital contraceptive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Natural Cycles really FDA cleared as a contraceptive?
Yes. Natural Cycles received FDA De Novo clearance as a Class II medical device for contraception in August 2018. It remains the only digitally delivered contraceptive cleared by the FDA. The clearance was based on clinical data from a prospective study of over 15,000 women, demonstrating a typical-use Pearl Index of 6.5 (approximately 93% effectiveness) and a perfect-use Pearl Index of 1.0 (approximately 99% effectiveness).

How effective is Natural Cycles compared to the pill?
Natural Cycles’ typical-use effectiveness rate (93%) is roughly comparable to combined oral contraceptives (approximately 93% typical use). Both methods have perfect-use rates above 98%. The key difference is the failure mode: pill failures are primarily due to missed doses, while Natural Cycles failures include both algorithm limitations and user behavior on red days (having unprotected intercourse despite a fertile designation).

How much does Natural Cycles cost?
Natural Cycles costs $99.99 per year (annual plan) or $12.99 per month (monthly plan). Both plans include a Bluetooth-connected oral basal thermometer. There are no additional hardware costs. Optional LH test strips from any brand can be used to improve algorithm precision but are not required.

Do I need to take my temperature at the exact same time every day?
Natural Cycles recommends measuring BBT at a consistent time each morning before getting out of bed. The algorithm can tolerate some variation, but inconsistent measurement times, alcohol consumption the night before, illness, and disrupted sleep can affect readings. Unreliable data points result in additional red (fertile) days as the algorithm accounts for uncertainty.

How many green days do users typically get per cycle?
The proportion of green days increases as the algorithm learns the individual user’s cycle pattern. New users may see more red days during the first one to three cycles. After the algorithm calibrates, most users with regular cycles report approximately 10 to 15 green days per cycle, though this varies based on cycle regularity and data quality.

Can Natural Cycles be used to help conceive?
Yes. Natural Cycles offers a “Plan a Pregnancy” mode that uses the same algorithm to identify the fertile window for conception timing rather than avoidance. The app shifts from displaying green/red days to highlighting the optimal conception window. This dual-use functionality is unique among FDA-cleared fertility products.

Free Daily Briefing

The Latest Longevity Science.
Delivered Every Morning.

Join researchers, physicians, and health professionals getting daily breakthroughs in AI-driven medicine, epigenetics, and longevity research.

Support the research that powers this editorial

Subscribe Free

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your inbox.